Should we carry out medical research on members of P.E.T.A. ?

P.E.T.A. have stated that they would still be against experiments involving animals if a cure for A.I.D.S. or leukemia was found through such experiments. This research is important to improving the quality of life of millions of people and needs to be done if we can afford it, if using animals is wrong, we need to find other ways, why not experiment on animal rights activists?


They seem to be the ones who are restricting the discovery of treatments which many of us need to live a full and happy life, and so are causing harm to other people, would sacrificing them be acceptable as it could save the lives of many others?


(I am aware that many experiments need genetically modified animals and am not sugesting we breed genetically modified P.E.T.A. members, but use existing ones for more basic research.)

Should we carry out medical research on members of P.E.T.A. ?
mick.trip....You are a danged genious! I love the way you think.


Keep up the originality of your thought. I appreciate you. Thanks for giving me a great laugh! And a resounding "YES" to your question. I think we should put criminals on the moon or in space somewhere while we're at it.
Reply:I have no moral or ethical problem with doing LIVE medical research on people of PETA.





However,,,,they're all a.ssholes,,,,,and we've already got surgial techniques to fix hemmeroids, we can vote in the next election, and they make Preparation H is on the shelf...so what could we learn from them? Not much I'm afraid but I could be wrong
Reply:no peta serves a great purpose they might go overboard at times but the protection of the animals is important as such peta does well .


after animal studies are done if that part goes well drugs and procedures are tested on people who volunteer . some might be from peta who knows .


new drugs and knowledge is needed but so too is the checks that we have in place to insure animals of any kind are not just mistreated for stupid things such as hair spray .


when it is possible not to test on animals and still insure safety of products we should use that option every time .
Reply:There's no difference between scientists who perform sadistic experiments on animals and the likes of Josef Mengele.
Reply:PETA= People eating tasty animals
Reply:No.





But it's a tempting notion.
Reply:medical experiements on animals or people is cruel done by cruel people for the sadistic pleasure they get out of tortureing little animals. Not all experients are necessary.


Some men start by tortureing little animals and then go to people.
Reply:PETA does not even deserve the periods they want in their acronym. I say to inject them with every disease known to man and then let them make the decisions for themselves. They are generally selfish azzholes anyway and would scream to have their own dog killed to save themselves. They thik they are the most self important people in the world. They are just a s.i.c.k. cult sort of organization and use terrorist tactics - and as we know - George Bush has sworn to eliminate terrorists.
Reply:P.E.T.A. is that people eating tasty animals?